Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Locks of Love: good cause, creepy postcard.

I'm glad I cut my hair.

I'm glad I donated it to Locks of Love, and if you have the opportunity to donate, I encourage you to do so as well.

I'm glad I got a nice thank you from them.

But, I'm sorry . . . that graphic* of the woman and girl sharing the same cascade of hair is a little bit creepy.

---
* My scanner is broken so the image above is not *my* postcard with *my* name on it but, rather, someone named Valerie's. Thanks, Valerie! Thanks, Google image search for "Locks of Love postcard."

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

New York in a nutshell--or in a Heineken ad.



To me, this is classic New York.

File under "you learn a new thing every day."

From "Bodyscapes, Biology, and Heteronormativity," by Pamela L. Geller, forthcoming in American Anthropologist's December 2009 issue:
Queering breastfeeding illumines alternative arrangements (Longhurst 2008). Children can procure milk from a variety of sources, including wet nurses, certain animal species, and even males. Yes, males possess mammary glands and have an underdeveloped, physiological capability to lactate (Diamond 1995; Giles 2003:185–197; Longhurst 2008:107–109). Modern medical treatments are often a stimulus for male lactation, but starvation and nipple stimulation are also catalysts (Bartlett 2002:375). That male lactation is natural, as well as awareness that biological maternity does not necessitate maternal responsibility, considerably queers our understanding of norms surrounding breastfeeding practices. While unusual, male lactation is worthy of consideration. “Showing other alternatives are thinkable by no means debunks our current beliefs,” historian of science Lorraine Daston remarks, “it only exposes as fraudulent the absolute authority with which we think them” (Conkey 1997:197).

Friday, June 19, 2009

On throwing up all over the Internet.

Can you tell I'm about to leave you soon and go underground again, for weeks at a time?

Can you tell by the guilt-ridden way I've been caressing the "publish post" button all night and now it's 2am and I am so going to regret staying up late when my dog licks my face off at 8am because she has to pee rightthisminutenow?

Yeppers. A week from now, I will be on a plane to Slovenia and Italy and I won't come back till July 10.

Brace yourself. I am about to rock my own world.

Belatedly, of Vinegar Hill House and anniversaries.

A while ago, I was going to write about Vinegar Hill House, wasn't I?

At the time it seemed urgent and pressing . . . and yet clearly it wasn't because I forgot to actually write about it. What can be said, with weeks since that visit? That I love love love love love their logo's font? That they are on a pretty little sidestreet of "Vinegar Hill," a micronabe that is often lumped into DUMBO, but there is nothing else around them but people's homes? That they seem to be of that "down home" Brooklyn ilk of restaurants so en vogue right now?
That, PLEASE NOTE, they have a back garden area, but you won't know this till you stand in line for the bathroom, and then you'll be slightly pissed you didn't get seated out there? That the cocktails were strong and olde-styled but not strong enough to make you forget you paid $9 for those little olde-styled cups they come in? That the cast-iron chicken was deeply delicious but not life-changingly inventive? That anything and everything is forgiven for a slice of Guinness cake? But that, secretly, I kind of still like homemade Guinness cupcakes better?


Yes. Evidently. All those things can be said, even weeks after a visit.

What can also be said? Happy Anniversary, honey. Weeks ... and weeks ... after our second wedding anniversary (5/26).



Congrats to us! Man, we just keep getting better-looking together!

Real Simple's edamame/lemon/tarragon risotto.



It was a nice light dish, and the texture of risotto paired with the still snappy crunch of edamame was pleasant. The combination of lemon zest and tarragon gave it a delicate, almost perfumed taste. We didn't have Parmesan on hand, so we used some aged Gouda instead ... and apologies to the cheese snobs who can actually discern a terrible difference, but cheese is cheese is cheese, by which I mean not that all of it is the same but that I love all of it. In any case, I don't think it "ruined" the dish.

Still. This recipe is not going in the "keeper" file.

Oh, shut up. You totally knew I had a file for that.

The power of place: Xu Xi and Joe Tsujimoto read at the Asian American Writers' Workshop.

Last night, I finally made it somewhere I've been meaning to go for years: The Asian American Writers' Workshop. AAWW has always had an interesting array of readings and schmoozy literary events, but it seems the bar has been raised even higher with the introduction of a beer sponsor (YAY for whatever Asian beer that was, so superdelicious, esp. at the super suggested donation price of $3)--BUT it must be noted that, before last night, I never managed to get my ass in gear enough to get there by the 7pm start time for the readings. Oh, I read the e-mail newsletters ... and oh, I penciled in grand plans to attend many a reading ... but oh, I never made it out of the apartment in time.

Last night, though ... last night I managed.

Vermont College of Fine Arts professor (and now faculty chair of the MFA in Writing, congrats)
Xu Xi was reading, and finally it was enough. Xu Xi was my very first VCFA workshop leader; I've enjoyed her meticulous feedback on my work, her warmth and openness in welcoming new students, and the voice of her own work, whether fiction or essay.

In addition, Xu Xi was paired with another writer whose work I was yet unfamiliar with--a man named Joe Tsujimoto--in a thematic evening centering on "the power of place."

If those elements--an admired professor + meditations on place/belonging/home--didn't already have my name written all over them . . . well, the night got stranger and better, still.

Xu Xi read from her gorgeous new book of essays, Evanescent Isles: From My City-Village.

Then, it turns out Joe Tsujimoto is a Japanese American fellow who was born and raised in New York . . . but who sauntered up to the stage wearing an aloha shirt. My interest was piqued. He walked like a local (of Hawai'i) man, he looked like a local man, he had the mannerisms of a local man . . . and then he opened his mouth and it was New York, but it was New York inflected by something else, a different accent, and a different cadence, something not so measured you could call it rhythm, something more full of life and mindful energy, something improv . . . something like jazz. It probably says something that I didn't realize until I Googled him that the book from which he read was prose not poetry. I could have listened to him read for hours. And, actually, his stories were long enough that to read aloud his entire book might have taken hours ... though I don't mean this at all as a slight of any sort. His stories were epic, they were meandering, they were mini-odysseys through fascinating lives.

Equally fascinating is his life, which, to just take its starting and present points, is pretty much the reverse trajectory of my own. People always want to know how I could grow up in Hawai'i and end up in New York; I wonder if Joe ever gets a variation--how could he grow up in New York and end up in Hawai'i? Implied in the question is some sense that the two places are so utterly night and day that how could it possibly make sense that a person could find himself or herself at home in both. People can't believe it, but it happens all the time. In fact it makes perfect sense. Life is long, and life without change in it is even longer ... and more boring, too.

When the readings were over, I started to try to angle my way in to say hello to Xu Xi, who I am hoping to land as an advisor for next semester--the thesis semester. But I was happily waylaid by another familiar face: Luis Francia, AAWW board member and my former Sarah Lawrence professor of Asian American Literature.

And, as if things could get any better after all of that, next thing I know I'm at Mandoo Bar, happily esconsed at a large table with Xu Xi, Luis Francia, two of my VCFA classmates, another young woman who just graduated from Amherst, and a friend of Xu Xi's. We were later joined by two other friends, including AAWW Executive Director Ken Chen.

Ok, I'll admit it: Sometimes it's really worth getting out of your pajamas and going into the city.

Orangey deliciousness.





You get fricken deliciousness... especially after you toss some couscous with pine nuts, golden raisins, almonds, and a few dashes of salt and pepper...


And then you get seconds.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

The Nahe-Nano sleepover.

Steak with pepita "pico de gallo" and guacamole.

Real Simple calls it "Skirt Steak with Pepita Sauce and Warm Tortillas," but the pepita part is less sauce than side garnish, more of a cilantro-pumpkin seed-onion-lime very chunky salsa or salad. Really more of a pico de gallo--except, of course, for the fact that it lacks tomato.

Anyway, who cares what you call it? It was delicious, especially paired with a (few) Mexican beers. Yum!

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Got my nails did.

Kay, I know purple is more of a wintery nail color than a summery one, but I think my nails look pretty damn good.

Why last night was LAME.

Because I really, really, really meant to get to Adrienne's party in Park Slope. I live in Clinton Hill; both areas are in Brooklyn; it really shouldn't have been so hard to pull off. The party didn't start till 10pm, which was unfortunate because that's inching towards my witching hour where I start to go horizontal with the tv or a book or to cuddle up with my dog or my man, but it couldn't be helped, because some of the rest of the world still lives that way.

Instead of being lame like I usually am--wherein I say I'll go out and then 9pm approaches and passes and I get too lazy to leave--I really, really, really meant to go to this party. I got dressed up. I put on makeup. I even combed my hair, people--okay, with my fingers, but still! I put on perfume, for christsake. I went in the subway, caught the G to Fulton St., got out, walked to Atlantic. Went back in the subway and went down to the M/R platform ... And then proceeded to wait for FOURTY-FIVE MINUTES, while 3 Ds and 4 Ns went by, none of which helped me go to Park Slope.

I had left a little late, and all that transferring and walking took a while, so it was already stretching to be a later night than I intended, so I waited, and waited, and then finally gave the train fifteen more minutes to show. At the stroke of fifteen, that was it, I was going home.

The stroke came and left, and so did I.

I know. LAME. I could have caught a cab, but honestly at that point I was not in a party-going mood. And you can't convince me out of a mood. But seriously, how can it be that hard to go under two miles?!

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Hey, by the way, a few new things...

Right! I forgot! If it hasn't happened on my blog, it hasn't really happened. My bad.

Also? This was supposed to be a quickie blog entry, but then it exploded. WAPACHOW.

I got my hair cut! Actually, I got it cut about a month ago, at the Roy Teeluck Salon by the very talented Antoine Brechu, compliments of my generous in-laws who gave me a gift certificate to the swanky salon. When consulting with Antoine, I told him I wanted to go short and brought in two pictures of different haircuts I had narrowed it down to, with the help of Dave's cousin Neil, a fancyschmancy hairdresser based (for now) in Detroit. One was from a Bloomingdale's ad, or something of the ilk, an adorable bob, very soft and feathery layers, face framing pieces near the chin that curled up at their tips, and really great sideswept bangs. The other was the short cut that Victoria Beckham had for a while, very pixie, veryvery short, kind of punky, kind of bedhead. It was sort of amusing when I showed him the pictures, because I could see him gathering his thoughts before gently informing me that those were two very different cuts, and it depended on what I wanted reflected in my life more at this moment: softness or edge, femininity or this kind of trendy tomboyishness. I shrugged helplessly and said I liked both, citing only one condition, that of low maintenance. He asked what do I mean by low maintenance, particularly, like what do I currently do to my hair. I said, "Brush it. Sometimes." He waited a beat or two, then realized that was the end of my hair routine. So, Antoine took my head in his hands and gave me the best parts of both haircuts, and better yet he added, "and with this haircut, you don't even have to brush it." I love that man. He is a magician.

As you can tell from the smiley-glowy pictures,* I was pretty darn happy with the results--and Locks of Love got a good 13 inches of healthy hair from my head since I don't know how to use product or a hairdryer.

Next up was new tattoos! I know this seems like a bunch of random large-scale changes for no reason and at the last minute, but I assure you that even if I don't mention things in conversation or shout them across the Internet via this blog, these (haircut, tats) were things that had been percolating for a while. Here is a first shot of the tattoos, where we were trying to include the hair, too.


But you can't really read the tattoos in that picture, so here's another that you might have better luck with:


I don't know. Can you see, though? To the left, it reads "roots"; to the right, it reads "wings." The tattoo artist was Ryoko at Brooklyn Tattoo, a true badass when it comes to freehanding lettering. I mean, not that she freehanded the tattoo onto me, because that likely would have given me a coronary, but she did create the "font" herself, from scratch, and within about 5-8 minutes. Like I said, badass. I went in there with some idea of curlycued script, even downloaded the Coca-Cola font from some online tattoo font company, but I was much happier walking away with her original artfont, you know? Makes it a bit more special. Makes you remember even more so the why and how and when and where and who of your tattoo. Because it's not just a spur of the moment kind of thing, it's not to be trendy, it's not to be tough; it's because you are feeling something big inside yourself, something too big to be contained by your skin, something you want to remember, something you can't let yourself forget.

As for the actual tattooing, it was all good, not killer painful but obviously yeah still somewhat painful ... except that I forgot to breathe for about a full minute halfway in and almost passed out/threw up. Otherwise, it was superdandy!

But back to the meaning ... I have wanted to get the words "roots" and "wings" tattooed on me for a looooong time. What does it mean, people want to know, and I want to tell them: so many things, all of them hard to articulate. That’s the problem with tattoos, really. They are deeply personal, commissioned works of art that make a heck of a lot less sense to anyone who isn’t you. Like, people GET IT when you manage to spout something when put on the spot, but they secretly also think to themselves: I would never tattoo that on my skin. You manage to come off like an asshole, trying to hard to sound profound and instead coming off pretentious. But there you have it. Take my word that no matter how shallow the next few attempts to explain seem, they are totally deep and meaningful and if you don’t get that from my words, then you just don’t get it because, like, you’re not deep enough. LOL.

And you know what, it was kind of the occasion of Sidewalk Monkey and Jam Guy’s wedding that got
me to finally do it ... I mean, isn't that—aren’t they—exactly where we all hope to land? At some compromise between where we came from and where we've been and where we're headed. I don't really mean physically/geographically (although for me that is also true), I mean internally, like who we are, our identities, our people connections and so forth. It’s a reminder that I can have both, that I don’t have to choose, I can tangle together with the people who have always been there, always meant so much, who raised me into the possibilities of the person I am becoming, but that doesn’t mean I can’t also fling myself wide and far, meet other persons and go other places who/that will further shape me, that I don’t have to lose one to gain the other, that I can be a person balanced between these things. In fact, that is exactly what it is about: balance. Balance in one’s life. Settling down without settling. Having an adventure-filled life even with the more anchoring elements, like marriage and someday children and someday even further a mortgage (Dear Mr. President: Please fix the economy or I will rent until I die. Love, Mayumi). Realizing that I didn’t “try out” the east coast, and then “try out” the west coast, and then try to determine where between those two and Hawaii I really belong … no, all those chapters just enabled a Newer, Improved, More Realized me, a me that has lived those lives and now lives another, which will just go on to enable another me, down the line. Mayumi 5.0, yo—less corruptions, less reboots, more battery life—watch out: coming to a year near you. It is also literally about those places that formed me. Hawai’i, clung to as fiercely as family, either a lei or a noose around my neck, but in any case ever in my heart, the place I will always mean when I say the word “home,” no matter where I am living and no matter if I never move back. New York, hotchacha lover but neurotic to the bone; New York who I have fallen out of love with, to be frank, but with whom I’d like to stay friends and where I’ve funnily enough found myself living yet again. And San Francisco, you who I warmed to at glacial speed and temperature, but where I found, after I stopped worrying so much about where I belonged, that I belonged--for a time, anyway.

Balance. Balance. Balance. Finding somewhere that will nurture your dreams and values and worldview and aesthetic. Divining the middle point between your expectations of yourself versus others’ expectations of you. Bridging the distance between where you are in life versus where you want so badly to be. And realizing that somewhere is not a zip code, it’s not a thing you can Google map. It’s internal; it’s in your head; it’s in your heart; it’s learning to grow the fuck up in your own life so that you can hold your head tall, walk proud, and be balanced in your SKIN. And when you get there, you just know it. The drama and silliness and pettiness and all that crap you spent so much goddamn energy worrying about just aren’t worth it anymore. You stop cross-examining yourself.

As a certain wise friend once said, “Why not expect to get the life you want?”**

Why not, indeed.

And so, roots and wings, my friends.

Roots and wings.

---
* All pictures taken by and courtesy of that budding photographer-husband of mine.
** Sidewalk Monkey, Surfrunner, and my dear Hina, roots and wings is also, for various reasons, dedicated to each of you, and you are as thickly in my tattoo (and heart, duh) as ink is in my dermis.

Let love come at you like a bull to the torero: an extended metaphor for love in these times.

A dear friend of mine, somewhat recently "out" to her parents, confided that she's having a difficult time explaining to them why she is out. They seemingly no longer disagree with her being gay, which is a huge step for them!, but now are worried about her safety if she is out to the world.

Here were the best two arguments for outness I could thunk up. Comment away if you have some more...

I think you should bring up the point of miscegenation. Remind your mom that it was not so long ago that the same discriminatory mindset and laws applied to persons of different races who had fallen in love and wanted to be together. That it wasn't "safe," that it wasn't "easy," but that love was something worth standing up for, living openly, and being true to. I mean, if we were back in that day and age, would she have advised you to not hold the hand of, not be "out"
with, not honor and cherish the person you love with your proudness of them and of being with them and happiness with them just because they were of a different race than you?

Actually, that's another good point. Has your mom thought about how unfair it is to both you and the person you love to NOT be out and open? With the divorce rate at 60% and rising--that's more than one out of every two marriage, LOOK I DID MATH!--with Hollywood/famous/rich people quickie marriages (marry first, have a few nights of sex and dating, then get divorced within a week) truly weakening any Traditional Definition of Marriage (instead of same-sex
marriage doing so, as it is always accused of doing so), shouldn't we grab love by the horns if it comes to us at all? Shouldn't we don proudly and wave widely the absolute reddest cape of all, our hearts, right in the front of that pacing, snorting, wild beast? Shouldn't we invest every single ounce of ourselves, and do every single thing we can to cherish that love and that loved one and that person who loves us back, in order to even make it out of the gates at all without
getting gored or thrown to the side?

Yes. YES. YES!!! We Should!!! Let love come at you like a bull to the torero!

James Frey's A Million Little Pieces.

I didn't think I was going to make it through James Frey's A Million Little Pieces, but I finally did. Yeah, yeah, I know, that book was soooo 2003. So, sue me, I'm six years late.

I was of two minds about the book, really.

On the one hand, I knew the whole hubub about Frey, and being a literary darling when the book first appeared back in, whatwasit, 2003, and I knew about the fall-out, the live t.v. dressing down by Oprah in 2006, and so forth. I didn't much care about whether or not Frey had "lied," I wasn't so invested in a work of literature that I could feel "betrayed" one way or another. And, having now had a bit more exposure to the tricky balancing act that is writing creative nonfiction through Vermont College of Fine Arts, I'm probably a little more forgiving about the slight shifting of certain facts, and of realizing that any work--whether it be a novel, a book of short stories, a chapbook of poems, a memoir, a book of essays, a news article, a history book, any and every thing--is a thing created from a point of view, or sometimes several, but there is no such thing as an Absolute Truth. There is only the truth as this person or these persons lived it. Look how open-minded and level-headed I was. I wanted to evaluate the book as itself, as a book, as a tale of addiction and recovery, of bottoming out and climbing back to the top, et cetera, et cetera. I wanted to see if the hubub was just car-crashism, just our voyeuristic need to read a hard/terrible story and have it be true, or whether the book could have stood tall on its own literary two feet.

On the other hand, I had a very hard time reading it. I almost gave up, three or more times. The book is 432 long pages, and not easy ones either. Frey is very often repetitive (words, sentences, entire paragraphs, physical symptoms, emotional feelings, etc.), Frey is often extremely graphic about drugs/withdrawl/sex, Frey sometimes seems to be trying too hard with fragmented lists of words that are either an attempt to come off as literary or to evoke a stream of consciousness. In not a few chapters, it feels like nothing is happening except him throwing up grotesquely and either dreaming of drugs or wanting them very badly. In the early chapters, it is difficult to distinguish the different characters from each other, only because there are so many of them and perhaps not enough physical details for this reader to distinguish them. There are moments where Frey crosses the line between drama and melodrama. A little over halfway through, after I'd already resolved to give up twice, it finally began to pick up for me. Things clicked into place, characters distinguished themselves from each other, and I began to feel invested in the story and in what happened to the characters in the book. And by the end of the book, I was glad I stuck with the book. It won't go onto any Favorite Books list; I don't want to ever read it again; but I am glad I stuck with it.

For me, the book did stand on its own two feet. I didn't think it was quite the Literary Feat of the Twenty-First Century, as many of the initial press said it was, but it was a well-written book. Even the flaws I mention above now seem like skillful moments of crafting on the part of Frey, in retrospect. It's a hard book to read? Well, withdrawl, rehab, and recovery is hardly an easy experience to go through. You almost gave up reading the book several times? Frey almost gave up on his recovery several times. The book is long and hard? Being forced to confront one's demons and dangers ain't exactly a quick and easy walk in the park either. Frey is repetitive, graphic, fragmented? Frey's thoughts, while recovering from and learning to live without his dangerous and many addictions, were probably quite repetitive, graphic, and fragmented themselves. It often feels like nothing is happening. Perhaps it felt that way in rehab. It was hard to tell the characters apart at first. Perhaps it was that way for him, too, all these new characters in this world into which he's been thrown and do recall, too, that he was still fucked up and so probably could barely tell them apart. Sometimes Frey crosses the line between drama and melodrama? So did his life. A little over halfway through, the story finally began to pick up? That's when things started picking up, falling into place, et cetera for him too. And, finally, in retrospect, you were glad you finished, though his story will never be your favorite story? Frey would probably agree with this assessment of his own life to that point.

I would cautiously recommend it, kind of. I mean, if you sat me down and ask for a list of books I thought you should read, A Million Little Pieces would not be on my list. However, if you sat me down and asked if I thought it was "worth it" to read the book, I'd say yes. But if you then asked why, I'd wearily refer you to this blog entry. Which has gotten way, way, way, way too long, repetitive, and fragmented.

You know.
Because.
Of what I just read.
This book.
Book.
Memoir?
Fiction?
Whatever the hell it is.
Who cares.
Settle down, Oprah and world.
Stop being voyeurs.
Stop needing the car crash with the real blood.
Sometimes settle for the ketchup stage blood.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Yummy: Brooklyn's Early Bird granola recipe.

Brooklynite Nekisia Davis has been selling her delicious Early Bird granola at the Brooklyn Flea. She's been written up in New York Magazine, she's appeared on the Martha Stewart show demonstrating how to make her granola. And now the recipe itself is on the loose, via the Martha Stewart site and The Greene Grape blog!

I have to say, though: the packaging is so cute and cheerful, and the Flea is so close to me, that I'll probably continue being lazy, leave the granola making to her, and buy it from her. :)

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Officially hilarious: pet umbrellas.

(Order a pet umbrella from Petco for the woofy in your life. And then laugh, mercilessly, at how ridiculous they look walking down the street like that. People! Dogs are meant to get wet, not fit in your purse!)

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Wings.

Tonight, on the way home from dinner at Vinegar Hill House,* Dave and I saw a girl with tattoos of wings on her feet. We immediately did the polite thing, which was to stare at her feet and start whispering about the tats. Awesome. Here was the conversation we had--the latter part of which thankfully happened after we transferred off her train:

Mayumi: She had wings! On her feet! 

Dave: Yeah.

Mayumi: Is that supposed to be like ... wait, it's not even right, the wings are backwards, but is she supposed to be what'shisface, Mercury or something? What's his name?

Dave (simultaneously): Hermes?

Mayumi (simultaneously): Herpes?

Dave: Um. I'm pretty sure it's not herpes.

Both: Bwahahahahahahaha!

---
* More about them later!
All rights reserved by author. In other words, NO STEAL. My watchdog (grrrrooowl) is Sitemeter, feel free to check me out.